Super Lawyers - Badge
Justia 10 Lawyer Rating - Badge
Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished - Badge
Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers - Badge
Massachusetts Bar Association 1911 - Badge
Boston Bar Association - Badge
Avvo 5 Stars - Badge
Martindale-Hubbell - Badge
Avvo 10 Rating Top Attorney - Badge
United States District Court / District of Massachusetts - Badge
Top 40 Under 40 / The National Trial Lawyers - Badge
Boston Top Lawyers 2023 - Badge

Case Results

  1. Criminal Trial Results
  2. Civil Trial or Evidentiary Hearing Results

Criminal Trial Results

Statue of Samuel Adams in Boston
  • 2024 – Not Guilty – Middlesex County Superior Court, Woburn Division Bench Trial – Armed Assault with Intent to Murder
  • 2024 – Not Guilty – Suffolk County Superior Court Jury Trial – Assault and Battery causing Serious Bodily Injury
  • 2024 – Not Guilty – Suffolk County Superior Court Jury Trial – Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon causing Serious Bodily Injury
  • 2024 – Not Guilty – Newton District Court Bench Trial – Assault and Battery on a Family or Household Member
  • 2023 – Not Guilty – Middlesex County Superior Court, Woburn Division Jury Trial – Armed Assault with Intent to Murder
  • 2023 – Not Guilty – Lowell District Court Jury Trial – Assault and Battery on a Police Officer
  • 2023 – Not Guilty – Waltham District Court Jury Trial – Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol, 2nd Offense
  • 2022 – Not Guilty – Waltham District Court Jury Trial – Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol
  • 2021 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Bench Trial – Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol
  • 2021 – Not Guilty – Waltham District Court Jury Trial – Assault and Battery on a Family/Household Member
  • 2021 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Bench Trial – Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol
  • 2020 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Bench Trial – Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol
  • 2020 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Jury Trial – Assault and Battery on a Police Officer
  • 2020 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Jury Trial – Violation of a Restraining Order
  • 2019 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Jury Trial – Strangulation
  • 2019 – Not Guilty – Marlborough District Court Jury Trial – Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol
  • 2019 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Jury Trial – Threat to Commit Murder
  • 2019 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Jury Trial – Strangulation; Threat to Commit Murder
  • 2019 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Bench Trial – Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol
  • 2019 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Bench Trial – Operating Under the Influence of Alcohol
  • 2019 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Jury Trial – Assault and Battery on a Family/Household Member; Intimidation of a Witness
  • 2019 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Bench Trial – Operating Under the Influence, 3rd Offense
  • 2018 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Bench Trial – Assault and Battery
  • 2018 – Not Guilty – Natick District Court Bench Trial – Operating Under the Influence, 3rd Offense
  • 2018 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Bench Trial – Open & Gross Lewdness
  • 2018 – Not Guilty – Framingham District Court Bench Trial – Operating Under the Influence
  • 2008 – Not Guilty – Lynn District Court Jury Trial – Operating Under the Influence of Drugs (Misdemeanor)
  • 2004 – Not Guilty – Peabody District Court Jury Trial – Indecent Assault and Battery (Felony)
  • 2003 – Not Guilty – Lynn District Court Jury Trial – Assault & Battery with a Dangerous Weapon (Felony); Leaving the Scene of an Accident Causing Personal Injury (Misdemeanor)

Back to Top


Civil Trial or Evidentiary Hearing Results

  • Division of Administrative Law Appeals; Represented Medical Doctor before Magistrate; Finding – no negligence.
  • Norfolk County Superior Court. Represented Medical Doctor against Medical Malpractice Claim; Settled After Case Submitted to Jury.
  • U.S. District Court. Represented Defendant Healthcare Providers during Rule 65 evidentiary hearing/trial before the Honorable Timothy Hillman on the civil rights of a patient seeking treatment for quadriplegia. Finding – no orders issued against clients.
  • U.S. District Court. Represented Defendant Medical Providers during Rule 65 evidentiary hearing/trial before the Honorable Douglas P. Woodlock on the civil rights of patient seeking treatment regarding transgender issues. (Under Advisement)
  • Essex County Superior Court. Represented Defendant Healthcare Providers Against Civil Rights & Medical Malpractice Claims. Jury Verdict for Defendants.
  • Essex County Superior Court. Represented Defendant Manufacturer Against Product Liability Claim. Settled After Several Days Trial before jury.
  • Bristol County Superior Court. Represented Defendant Doctor against Medical Malpractice Claim. Jury Verdict for Defendants.
  • Suffolk County Superior Court. Represented Defendant Healthcare Providers Against Medical Malpractice Claims. Jury Verdict for Defendants.

Back to Top

Client Reviews

Koufman Law Group, LLC retained me as an expert in a medical case. They effectively and thoroughly prepared for trial by, for instance, developing a good working knowledge of the content of my testimony. They also helped me determine the best manner by which I presented my expert testimony, and at...

Peter M. (Medical Expert - Malpractice)

I am a medical doctor who has worked with K&F on a number of cases. I am consistently impressed with the K&F team's collaborative approach, with their individual commitment, and with their strong litigation skills.

Thomas X. (Medical Malpractice & Civil Rights)

Attorney Koufman was able to do the job that two other attorneys couldn't and he got my case dismissed. I highly recommend him. He answered my phone calls and was extremely attentive to my case. He stuck up for me when nobody else would and he didn't let the system trample me.

Edward

I received a "Not Guilty" verdict. Everything was just fantastic. Attorney Koufman looked at every single thing. I am very happy about what he did. He's a very good lawyer. He's respectful. The jury was six women and one guy, and they liked him very much.

Antonio

Contact Us

  1. 1 One Team
  2. 2 One Mission
  3. 3 Your Success

Fill out the contact form or call us at 617-423-2212 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message